|
Second Sunday of Lent, 2006
Fr Ivan Aquilina
Charles Gore
In Oxford, Charles Gore met Joseph Arch, a trade union leader. Arch took
Gore for a walk among the slums of Oxfordshire. This moment was fundamental
for Gore. His inclinations towards social justice were confirmed and from
that moment till his death he remained passionately committed to this
cause. Even his biblical teaching and theological reflection had this
in mind. His own personal devotion to Jesus Christ, and single-minded
determination to serve him in the poor, shines through page after page
of his writings. In Charles Gore was a strong note of social protest against
oppressive systems and structures. As with the warmth of his personal
devotion, one senses that he had only to get a whiff of social justice
in a text before he was on to it, calling (for instance) for a new sense
not just of sin but of social sin, a very new concept at the time.
Educated in Harrow and Balliol College he became the first principal of
Pusey House at the age of 31. He was a committed High Churchmen who because
of his convictions brought a new dimension to Anglo-Catholicism especially
when at the age of 36 he edited the publication “Lux Mundi”.
The famous Lux Mundi showed the relevance of the Church’s prophetic
ministry to the new order of society. The Lux Mundi group read the signs
of the times and used them to proclaim the eternal values of Scripture,
Tradition and Reason. The guiding principle of their reasoning is taken
from St John’s Gospel. The Eternal Word entered the world to re-establish
the relationship that God has with creation. Lux Mundi looked back behind
redemption to creation. Evolution was accepted as the work of the Logos
through whom all things were made. Humanity is part of the creative movement
of the Word, and therefore it manifests His Light. The Lux Mundi group
are against whatever hides this saving Light, whatever disfigures the
Image of God in men.
Gore saw the Church as a community engaged in social life. The Church,
by allowing its light to shine, represents Christ in the world. The Church
community must be the model of how life is meant to be. Gore stood for
the prophetic office of the Church as interpreting to the world that which
is good.
It may be that with these thoughts in mind he gathered around him like
minded men to be called the Community of the Resurrection. This community,
first founded in Oxford, than moving to London with its founder who became
Canon of Westminster Abbey finally settled in West Yorkshire, in Mirfield.
The reason for going there was in order for this community to be amongst
people whose work was hard, who had little colour or beauty in their life.
They wanted to show that the Church of England was not only for the wealthy
or comfortable middle classes. Their Gospel spoke of a Christ who took
on flesh, lived with the poor and the outcast and died the death of a
criminal. The community stood in the Catholic Social tradition of the
Church. There they opened a Seminary to train future priests in those
ideals, personally I am grateful to have been prepared for the Sacred
Priesthood in Mirfield.
From Westminster Gore became Bishop of Worcester, than Birmingham and
finally Oxford. During that time several Anglican clergy publicly declared
that an Anglican might reasonably deny the Virgin Birth and the physical
Resurrection of Christ and remain an Anglican. Gore was horrified, and
proposed to resign his bishopric to devote himself against a position
that he believed to be destructive of the Christian faith. His friends
persuaded him to reconsider. He did for a while but after the First World
War he resigned his See.
Charles Gore came to live here in number 6 Margaret Street from 1919 till
1927 when he was asked to move as the Choir School required the house.
Here he engaged himself in teaching Theology at King’s and at London
University and he also wrote his trilogy, later published as one work
called: “The Reconstruction of Belief.”
In one of his books called: “The Religion of the Church”,
after placing beyond any reasonable doubt the Church of England as part
of the One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church he speaks about prayer.
He says that prayer must be our chief occupation as in prayer we reach
out to God and reach out to humanity. This brings wholeness and in it
we can find our true vocation. We pray through Christ, with Christ and
in Christ to the Father and so our private prayer becomes the prayer of
the Church. Prayer brings results and we need to be ready for a prayer
answered as it is answered only when we are really open to the will of
Him who is granting. Gore than comments on the best of all prayers, the
Lord’s Prayer. A prayer he says that every child can understand
but only a saint can pray perfectly. He emphasises the point that this
is not an individual prayer but the prayer of the Church as we address
Our Father rather than my father and to give us today our daily bread
rather than give me my daily bread. Among other advice that he gives is
that concentration in prayer is helped if we concentrate in other aspects
of life as well. He also shows that when we start praying we are not starting
something new but just tapping in the eternal prayer of Christ to the
Father through the Holy Spirit. He ends by showing that the climax of
all prayer is reached in the celebration of the Mass. Indeed one can see
his holiness shining through these thoughts which are good thoughts to
consider in this our Lenten journey.
After Margaret Street Gore went to Mirfield, but he did not enclose himself
within the monastery. His driving passion for social justice was still
there. In fact he went to tour India. During this tour he was taken ill
and returned to Mirfield where he died.
Charles Gore is now one of the Anglican Beati, his feast day kept on the
17th January, the day of his birth to heaven. Indeed he was a prophet
and as all prophets something of an enigma: during his life he was often
accused by conservatives of being too liberal, and by liberals of being
too conservative. He was indeed ahead of his times and may be seen, in
the principles, as a forerunner of the movement of the Theology of Liberation,
but after all, all good theology is theology of liberation, of liberation
and redemption from sin. The last word must be from Charles Gore, who
looking at comfortable Anglican congregations challenges them by saying:
"I dare any one of you to say that [Christ's teaching] was not a
revolutionary doctrine. It is only because we are so used to the sound
of words that they can be uttered in any one of our congregations . .
."
During this week let us think if we have grown over familiar with the
words of the Saviour, if we have made religion a little bit much respectful,
if we still divorce our faith from our role in society.
|